...

As cybersecurity risks grow, here are the priorities of executives and cyber leaders

2026 Is the Year Cyber Risk Became a Leadership Test

2026 is shaping up to be the year cybersecurity stopped being a technical challenge and became a leadership one. It’s no longer just about defending networks or responding to incidents; it’s about how organizations make decisions under constant digital pressure.

Cyber risk is now inseparable from business risk, geopolitical instability, and public trust. Executives are no longer asking if an attack will happen, but whether their organizations are prepared to operate through it.

The era of delegating cyber risk downward is over. What comes next depends on leadership.

The Post-Mortem: Why Cyber Risk Outpaced Readiness

The conversations shaping 2026 reveal a consistent gap: strategy has not kept pace with exposure.

The Visibility Gap

  • Many leaders still lack a clear, shared understanding of their organization’s cyber risk. Security teams speak in technical terms, while executives think in financial and operational outcomes—leaving critical decisions misaligned.

The Talent and Capacity Strain

  • Cybersecurity teams are overstretched. Skills shortages, burnout, and rapid threat evolution have made it increasingly difficult to sustain effective defense with traditional staffing and structures.

The Fragmented Response Model

  • Cybersecurity is often siloed from enterprise risk management. As a result, cyber incidents escalate into business crises because they are not planned for as such.

The 2026 Outlook: What Leaders Say Must Change

If 2025 exposed the stakes, 2026 will demand action.

1. Cyber Risk Moves Into the Boardroom

Cybersecurity is no longer an operational footnote.

The Shift: Boards and executive teams are expected to actively oversee cyber risk as part of core governance, strategy, and resilience planning.

The Consequence: Leadership accountability for cyber outcomes is becoming unavoidable.

2. Resilience Becomes the Real Metric

Blocking every attack is unrealistic.

The Shift: Executives are prioritizing resilience—maintaining critical services, protecting trust, and recovering quickly—over purely preventive approaches.

3. Collaboration Replaces Isolation

Cyber threats do not respect organizational or national boundaries.

The Shift: Greater cooperation between governments, industries, and institutions is increasingly seen as essential to manage systemic cyber risk.

The Risk: Without trust and coordination, individual defenses will continue to fail against collective threats.

The Buttom Line

2026 makes one thing clear: cybersecurity is no longer a technical discipline—it is a leadership competency. Cyber risk has grown because decision-making structures did not evolve alongside digital dependence. Navigating the years ahead requires two things: executive ownership of cyber resilience and organizational integration that treats cybersecurity as a core element of risk, strategy, and continuity. In a permanently connected world, how leaders govern cyber risk will define how resilient their institutions truly are.

Source

  • Article: Cybersecurity risk in 2026: Here’s what executives and cyber leaders say needs to be done

  • Publisher: World Economic Forum

  • Context: Insights from global executives and cyber leaders on managing cyber risk, resilience, and governance in 2026